Buy a demo-kit now & test tomorrow!

Double Parking Detection

Practical guide for cities and system integrators: how to detect, evidence and enforce roadside double parking using per‑space sensors, edge vision/ANPR and enforcement workflows. Procurement checks, deployment checklist, pilot metrics and real project references included.

double parking detection
illegal double parking
ANPR
LoRaWAN

Double Parking Detection

Double Parking Detection – real-time double parking alerts, curb double parking, ANPR double parking

Double Parking Detection is a frontline capability for cities that want to keep curb lanes moving, protect transit reliability and reduce the safety risks caused by roadside double parking. Effective double parking detection combines per‑space occupancy sensing, curbside camera/ANPR evidence and enforcement workflows so cities can convert observations into citations, warnings or dynamic curb controls. Fleximodo's platform combines IoT parking sensors, edge vision modules and a central CityPortal for enforcement and reporting to enable Real-time double parking alerts and automatic double parking reporting.

Key operational drivers for municipal decision‑makers:

  • Reduce bus delays and transit schedule variance caused by illegal double parking (traffic flow double parking impact).
  • Improve enforcement efficiency with automated evidence and ANPR integration.
  • Lower operational cost by automating Double parking monitoring and targeted patrols instead of blanket roving enforcement.
  • Provide defensible evidence to adjudication teams (photo + timestamp + permit/ANPR match) so double parking enforcement produces higher citation yield and fewer appeals.

For system owners the immediate measures are detection accuracy, end‑to‑end latency for Real-time double parking alerts, and the integrity of the enforcement chain (sensor → evidence capture → CityPortal → enforcement officer). The combined sensor + enforcement approach and the CityPortal enforcement and notification modules are designed to create a clear audit trail.

Standards and regulatory context

Accurate double parking detection must align with evidence rules and privacy regulations (GDPR), radio certifications for wireless sensors, and curb data standards (for example the Curb Data Specification) when exchanging curb events with third‑party systems. Procurement checks should include data‑minimisation design, evidence retention policies and radio compliance.

  • GDPR / local privacy law: use edge processing and selective evidence export to minimise personal data exposure.
  • Product safety and radio tests: request EN/ETSI and product safety test reports during tender evaluation.
  • Radio technology choices (LoRaWAN / NB‑IoT / LTE‑M) influence battery and topology tradeoffs; LoRaWAN updates in 2025 improved regional parameters for higher throughput and lower time‑on‑air, which directly reduces sensor energy consumption and improves network capacity.
  • EU-level guidance and smart city monitoring templates (Smart Cities Marketplace / Scalable Cities) help structure KPIs and reporting for pilot-to-scale projects.

Important procurement checks:

  • Verify where and how evidence is collected and stored (edge vs cloud), whether the system supports private APN security and encryption in transit (Real-time data transmission).
  • Request device radios and certification test reports (EN/ETSI) and gateway compatibility factsheets (e.g., Kerlink).
  • Validate camera/ANPR video handling, face/license plate redaction options and retention settings in the CityPortal.

Required tools and software (pragmatic minimal stack)

  • Per‑space IoT sensor — primary occupancy state for blocked parking space detection: Magnetometer double parking fused with Radar double parking detection where available.
  • Edge vision / ANPR camera — for photographic evidence and plate matching with permit databases.
  • Gateways / network server — LoRaWAN or NB‑IoT connectivity depending on coverage and operator strategy.
  • Back‑office platform — CityPortal for enforcement planning, evidence management, patrol routing and reporting.
  • Mobile enforcement app — dispatch real‑time alerts and collect final officer action.
  • Analytics & TCO tools — time‑series DB and cost model to forecast battery replacements and enforcement ops; connect outputs to Parking occupancy analytics.

Deployment checklist (operational minimum)

  • Site survey and curb policy map; annotate bus stops, taxi stands and loading zones.
  • Choose sensor mix: per‑space magnetometer + nano‑radar pucks for per‑slot confidence, plus targeted ANPR or pole cameras where evidence is mandatory (Occupancy sensor double parking).
  • Gateway placement and network test (LoRaWAN coverage or NB‑IoT SIM provisioning) — validate both coverage and time‑on‑air budget to estimate battery impact (LoRaWAN connectivity).
  • Integration test with CityPortal: event mapping, evidence retention policy and adjudication workflow.
  • Officer training and SLAs for response to Real-time double parking alerts.

How Double Parking Detection is installed / measured / implemented: step-by-step

  1. Site survey and curb classification: map curb sections vulnerable to roadside double parking and rank them by transit impact (bus routes, peak passenger loading). Link curb segments to parking rules in your CityPortal. Double parking monitoring
  2. Sensor selection & placement: select per‑space magnetometer + nano‑radar pucks for high confidence occupancy, and add VizioSense or ANPR cameras for evidence collection in enforcement zones.
  3. Network design: plan LoRaWAN gateways or NB‑IoT SIM profiles; run coverage and capacity tests for your expected reporting cadence.
  4. Integration & data model mapping: map sensor events to city data model and, if applicable, the Curb Data Specification for interoperability.
  5. Calibration & verification: validate detection accuracy with paired camera verification (ground‑truth runs) and tune occupancy thresholds for magnetometer and radar fusion.
  6. Enforcement workflow: configure CityPortal rules for penalty tiers and evidence capture (ANPR + photo) and officer notification channels.
  7. Pilot & metrics: run a minimum 4–8 week pilot per corridor to collect FP/FN metrics and measure the traffic flow double parking impact.
  8. Scale & optimisation: use pilot data to tune reporting intervals and sensor density; optimise battery vs reporting frequency for long operational life.
  9. Live operation & maintenance: implement daily sensor‑health reports, remote OTA firmware updates and scheduled field inspections.
  10. Reporting & continuous improvement: publish enforcement KPIs and open curb event summaries for stakeholders and iterate on camera placement and sensor density.

Common misconceptions (quick clarifications)

  • "One sensor type solves everything": sensor fusion is the practical answer — per‑space magnetometers + nano‑radar deliver high availability in harsh conditions, while targeted ANPR gives evidential strength.
  • "LoRaWAN means poor security": modern LoRaWAN stacks and private APNs can be operated securely; always demand encryption and certificate‑based server auth.
  • "Battery life is fixed": battery life depends on reporting cadence, radio choice and configuration. Use Sensor health monitoring and onboard coulomb metering to plan replacements and TCO.

Current trends and advancements

  • LoRaWAN regional parameter updates in 2025 improved data rate and time‑on‑air efficiency, enabling devices to reduce energy per message and supporting larger urban rollouts. This directly benefits per‑space sensors in dense smart‑city deployments.
  • EU smart‑cities programs and the Smart Cities Marketplace provide harmonised reporting templates that make pilot KPIs easier to compare and replicate across cities. Use those templates when collecting pilot metrics.

Practical procurement callout — Battery & lifetime

Design battery life scenarios around message cadence and time‑on‑air. Example from published Fleximodo illustrations: at ~20 daily events a per‑space sensor commonly reaches multi‑year operation (8+ years in typical moderate traffic configurations). For tender documents include a battery life worked example and specify coulomb‑metering & remote health reporting to avoid surprise field replacements.

Key Takeaway from Graz Q1 2025 pilot

Graz pilot materials show how combining per‑space sensors with targeted pole cameras and a central enforcement portal produced operational stability during winter tests and measurable reductions in curbside dwell times on transit corridors. The city pilot materials and project brochures (EU/Interreg programme) are useful references when designing pilot KPI sets.

Summary

Double Parking Detection is a systems problem: sensing, evidence, enforcement and integration. Cities that combine per‑space magnetometer+radar occupancy sensors with targeted ANPR or edge vision capture and a back‑office enforcement platform reduce bus delays, speed adjudication and produce defensible double‑parking violation evidence. The stack described above (sensors, edge ANPR, gateways, CityPortal, and mobile enforcement) is the minimum pragmatic architecture for municipal pilots and scaleouts.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is Double Parking Detection?

Double Parking Detection is the combined use of per‑space occupancy sensors, curbside cameras/ANPR, and enforcement workflows to detect, evidence and respond to roadside double parking and blocked parking space scenarios. It includes automated double parking reporting and Real-time double parking alerts.

  1. How is Double Parking Detection installed / measured / implemented in smart parking?

Implementation follows a 7–10 step process (site survey, sensor selection, network provisioning, calibration, CityPortal integration, pilot validation and scale). Detailed steps and calibration checks are provided above in the HowTo section.

  1. Which sensor technology works best for double parking monitoring?

For per‑slot certainty, hybrid magnetometer + nano‑radar sensors provide high detection reliability in snow and harsh weather; targeted ANPR and edge vision are recommended where photographic evidence is required for citation. See the sensor selection guidance above and ensure field verification with Sensor health monitoring.

  1. How do ANPR workflows interact with enforcement?

ANPR handles identification: pair plate reads with permit databases to determine illegal double parking or permitted loading. The CityPortal manages evidence, officer dispatch and adjudication workflows to convert ANPR captures into citations.

  1. What battery life and TCO should cities expect for occupancy sensor deployments?

Battery life varies with reporting cadence and radio. Vendor examples typically show multi‑year lifetimes; published Fleximodo examples indicate 8+ years in moderate daily event scenarios. Always request example calculations and specify coulomb‑metering and remote health reporting in tenders.

  1. How do you measure the traffic‑flow impact after deployment?

Use before/after measures: bus route travel times and variance, double‑parking event frequency and average clearance time (report → officer arrival → resolution). Feed these into Parking occupancy analytics and iterate sensor density where high impact is shown.

Optimize your parking operation with Double Parking Detection

Deploying double parking detection combines robust per‑space sensing with targeted evidence capture to convert nuisance curbside double parking into measurable reductions in transit delay and enforcement cost. Fleximodo’s sensor family, VizioSense cameras and CityPortal create a ready‑to‑deploy stack for municipal pilots and scaled curb management — map a pilot to high‑impact corridors and estimate 10‑year TCO before procurement.

Learn more (selected external references)

  • LoRa Alliance — LoRaWAN regional parameters & LPWAN updates (2025).
  • State of the European Smart Cities (Scalable Cities / Smart Cities Marketplace).
  • Interreg / SOLEZ — project brochures and Graz pilot materials (VALUE_ADDED_GRAZ).

References

Below are short, deployment‑level descriptions of selected projects from Fleximodo datasets and field rollouts. These provide real-world evidence for sensor types, scale and longevity.

Pardubice 2021 (Czech Republic)

  • Deployed: 2020‑09‑28
  • Sensors: 3,676 × SPOTXL NBIOT
  • Reported days in dataset: 1,904 (dataset field: zivotnost_dni)
  • Notes: large‑scale NB‑IoT single‑network deployment with long operational track record and central CityPortal integration; useful reference for NB‑IoT connectivity rollouts.

RSM Bus Turistici (Roma Capitale, Italy)

  • Deployed: 2021‑11‑26
  • Sensors: 606 × SPOTXL NBIOT
  • Reported days in dataset: 1,480
  • Notes: corridor / depot monitoring use case with emphasis on integration to permit and fleet systems.

CWAY virtual car park no. 5 (Famalicão, Portugal)

  • Deployed: 2023‑10‑19
  • Sensors: 507 × SPOTXL NBIOT
  • Reported days in dataset: 788
  • Notes: virtual car‑park use case showing per‑slot reporting aggregated into virtual carpark objects in the CityPortal; relevant to Real‑time parking occupancy.

Kiel Virtual Parking 1 (Germany)

  • Deployed: 2022‑08‑03
  • Sensors: 326 (mix: OTHER, SPOTXL LORA, SPOTXL NBIOT)
  • Reported days in dataset: 1,230
  • Notes: mixed‑network deployment demonstrating coexistence of LoRaWAN connectivity and NB‑IoT devices.

Chiesi HQ White (Parma, Italy)

Skypark 4 Residential Underground Parking (Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Deployed: 2023‑10‑03
  • Sensors: 221 × SPOT MINI
  • Reported days in dataset: 804
  • Notes: successful residential underground deployment with a focus on long battery life and minimal maintenance. See Underground parking sensor.

Peristeri debug - flashed sensors (Peristeri, Greece)

  • Deployed: 2025‑06‑03
  • Sensors: 200 × SPOTXL NBIOT
  • Reported days in dataset: 195
  • Notes: recent debug / reflash batch demonstrating headroom for remote firmware management and OTA firmware updates.

(Full dataset includes more projects; these examples illustrate typical mixes of SPOTXL NBIOT, SPOTXL LORA and SPOT MINI across urban, corporate and underground contexts.)

Author bio

Ing. Peter Kovács — Technical freelance writer

Ing. Peter Kovács is a senior technical writer specialising in smart‑city infrastructure. He writes for municipal parking engineers, city IoT integrators and procurement teams evaluating large tenders. Peter combines field test protocols, procurement best practices and datasheet analysis to produce practical glossary articles and vendor evaluation templates.

(If you are responsible for procurement or pilots and want a templated tender checklist or pilot KPI worksheet, contact your Fleximodo account manager for the client‑zone resources.)